You are here:   Features > The French Path of Most Resistance
 

As we approach the 70th anniversary of Charles de Gaulle's historic broadcast from London on 18 June 1940 that inaugurated the French Resistance, interest in the story remains undiminished. It is, though, increasingly difficult for the French to fit the Resistance into their collective memory of this difficult period. There is a prevalent British misconception that the French exaggerate their glorious Resistance exploits-everyone claiming a "resister" in the family-in order to gloss over the darker aspects of the Occupation. In truth, those darker aspects are as present in public discussion today as the Resistance. Every school in Paris has a plaque reminding people of the role played by the Vichy state in the deportation of the Jews.


General de Gaulle and Georges Bidault (left) stride down the Champs Elysées after Paris's liberation on 26 August 1944 

The French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, on the other hand, has attempted to refocus attention on the Resistance. His first presidential decision was to instruct teachers to read to their junior classes every year a letter written from prison by the 17-year-old Resistance fighter Guy Môquet on the eve of his execution. Soon afterwards, Sarkozy visited the Plateau of Glières, site of a major Resistance uprising in 1944. This has led to accusations that Sarkozy is shamelessly annexing the Resistance to his cause. A film has just opened in Paris telling the story of Walter Bassan, a communist fighter at Glières, who was deported to Dachau. Now aged 82 and as vigorous as ever, Bassan argues in the film that Sarkozy's policies, especially its attacks on illegal immigrants, are a betrayal of the values he had joined the Resistance to defend.

The Resistance continues to excite the imagination because of its sheer drama and mystery. Nowhere are all these elements more perfectly encapsulated than in the story of Jean Moulin. As Prefect of Chartres in 1940, Moulin attempted suicide rather than sign a German document blaming Wehrmacht atrocities on black French troops. In October 1941, Moulin arrived in London-the most senior official to have joined de Gaulle up to that date-and returned to France as de Gaulle's representative to the Resistance movements. He was captured by the Germans on 21 June 1943 and died after atrocious torture. Moulin's emblematic status was consecrated in 1966 when de Gaulle's government transferred his remains to the Pantheon. On the day of his Presidential inauguration in 1981, François Mitterrand paid homage to the tomb of Moulin. In doing so, Mitterrand, who had himself been a Resistance member (after first supporting Vichy), sought to reclaim Moulin from Gaullism. Yet Moulin remains a controversial figure. Some former fighters accuse him of emasculating the "true" Resistance for de Gaulle's purposes. Others claim he was a crypto-communist, even a Soviet agent, and one recent book argues that on the eve of his capture he was about to desert de Gaulle and go over to the Americans.

Last summer saw the publication of the memoirs of Moulin's former secretary in the Resistance, Daniel Cordier. It is not the first time that Cordier has written on Moulin. After 1945, Cordier put his Resistance years behind him to become a modern art dealer-a passion he learnt from Moulin. In 1977, when participating in a television debate, he found himself confronted with the former Resistance leader Henri Frenay, who accused Moulin of crypto-communism. Lacking arguments to counter this accusation, Cordier embarked on a quest to determine the truth about the man he had served. Twenty years of indefatigable research produced four volumes on Moulin's life, running to almost 4,000 pages. Now, however, Cordier has moved from the register of history to that of memory: he tells his own story. His memoir has been a bestseller as well as winning literary prizes. It is one of the most brilliant memoirs of  the Resistance ever written, offering us innumerable insights — but it also raises problems about the relationship between history and memory.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Daniel12
April 9th, 2010
12:04 PM
No one was more severe than Cordier. He commented that he was reminded of Zola's comment on Dreyfus, who so disappointed his supporters when they actually met him: "It is enough to make you despair of the innocent.

Tom Max
February 16th, 2010
8:02 AM
Sarkozy's new approach to the politics of commemoration in France has also been inspired by the positions articulated in the recent books of Max Gallo and even by a rejuvenated Gaullist discourse of unity and grandeur in the Resistance.

frederic maldonado
February 1st, 2010
11:02 AM
"Resister" is a verb in French (resist). A member of the French resistance is called a "resistant".

DDoug Geivett
January 12th, 2010
5:01 PM
This is an exemplary review. Jackson's "mathematical error," which has been corrected, doesn't disqualify him as an informed and reliable commentator on these memoirs or on the Resistance more generally. English-only readers, interested in the period of German occupation of France, are dependent on thoughtful discussions like Jackson's for much of what they know. I've recommended Jackson's critical review of Cordier's memoirs over at my website: www.douggeivett.com

Oliver Wiseman
January 5th, 2010
10:01 AM
The error in this piece, which stated that we would be approaching the 60th anniversary of Charles de Gaulle's broadcast of 1940, has now been corrected.

orangeCat
January 4th, 2010
10:01 PM
"As Prefect of Chartres in 1940, Moulin attempted suicide rather than sign a German document blaming Wehrmacht atrocities on black French troops." I'd rather say : "Moulin attempted suicide rather than sign a German document blaming black French troops atrocities on the inhabitants of La Taye, a French village". Actually, the Wehrmacht was the author of those atrocities. Anyway, great article! As a French person, I always find easier to read about our dark times (i.e : Vichy) under the American (or : foreigner's) point of view...

Frederick Willman
January 2nd, 2010
4:01 AM
This is a fascinating article about fascinating people, notwithstanding Jackson's mathematical error in the first sentence. We're approaching the 70th, not the 60th anniversary, "of Charles de Gaulle's historic broadcast from London on 18 June 1940 that inaugurated the French Resistance..."

tiresias
December 31st, 2009
1:12 AM
Sorry. I couldn't get past the howler in the first sentence...

Anonymous
December 30th, 2009
9:12 PM
Better make the 70th anniversary of Charles de Gaulle's historic broadcast from London on 18 June 1940

alex
December 30th, 2009
8:12 PM
First sentence - 70th anniversary, I think you'll find.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.